|
|
 |
 |
|
Waveguide Filters |
 |
 |
|
Hairpin printed circuit filters on the lower microwave bands are popular and Paul Wade has done a great job of explaining how to design these for the rest of us, however I tend to favour waveguide based filters of various types for bands above 13cm. This has as much to do with my building block approach, as in the difficulty of achieving the sort of tolerances required at higher frequencies using home workshop printed circuit etching techniques. Paul’s characterisation of both Evanescent Mode Waveguide and Pipe-Cap filters is also to be commended.
I’ve had success in following the article “Design and Construction of Waveguide Bandpass Filters” by Dennis G. Sweeney WA4LPR and using his associated WGFIL program. However for filters requiring anything larger than WR90, size and bulk becomes an issue in portable gear.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
This is a two cavity design described by Zac Lau in “A High RF-Performance 10Ghz Band-Pass Filter” QEX July 1997, an extract provided on the ARRL Microwave Projects CD. It’s easy to construct with a short length of WR90 waveguide and some 5/16” hobby brass tube, a couple of SMA connectors and two small screws (opposite side of the waveguide) and it’s complete.
A real advantage of this filter design is that adjustment is simply a matter of tuning for a peak response using say a power meter. Optimising RL however would require a sweeper, but you’d get a good enough figure based on the peak repsonse anyway.
|
|
 |
 |
|
In both plots the horizontal divisions are 50Mhz, centred on 10368Mhz and vertical divisions are 10dB. The insertion loss is less than 2dB and note return loss is in excess of 20dB. For a 144Mhz IF with low side LO injection, the attenuation of LO and image would be equal or greater than 30dB making this a very effective little filter for a transverter.
|
 |
 |
|
I’ve also built a 10Ghz filter based on a 3 section design using the WGFIL program by WA4LPR. This is also fabricated in WR90 waveguide and is a post type filter using hobby brass tube for the posts.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
This filter is terminated in coax connections, it would be a simple matter to say terminate one or both ends with a waveguide flange for example. The construction is a little more complex than the previous filter however it shows a superior response but at increased complexity of adjustment. Adjusting this filter would be difficult without a sweeper and analyser.
|
|
 |
 |
|
The plots below show both the response of the filter and it’s return loss. Notice this 3 section waveguide filter shows quite steep skirts, the horizontal divisions on both plots are 50Mhz and the vertical divisions 10dB. With low side injection of the LO using a 144Mhz IF we can expect the LO and image frequencies to be some 50dB below 10368Mhz. After adjustment the return loss is of the order of 20dB, insertion loss is around 2dB. This will vary somewhat from filter to filter based on precision and mechanical tolerances adhered to by the constructor.
|
 |
 |
|
Recently I built filters based on Paul’s evanscent mode designs described in the proceedings of Microwave Update 2008 for both 3.4Ghz using WR90 and 5.76Ghz using WR62 waveguide. These filters were quick and easy to construct and while I used a sweeper and analyser to tune them, I suspect they can just as easily be tuned simply looking for a peak on a power meter to give similar results. A better approach for adjusting filters is to tune for RL (Return Loss) however this is not so easy with just a power meter indication to follow.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Copies of evanescent mode waveguide filters showing the 3.4Ghz and 5.76Ghz models. These filters are very easy and quick to construct, I’m currently using the 3.4Ghz model in a transverter quite successfully with a 144Mhz IF.
|
|
 |
 |
|
The response of the 5.76Ghz filter is shown below together with the return loss plot. A bit “lumpy” but perfectly useable in a 144Mhz transverter, the horizontal divisions on the plots are again 50Mhz/division and the vertical scale 10dB/division. This filter shows a reasonable sharp response, the LO and image are at least 30dB down and more and the return loss is close to 20dB, not bad for such a simple design.
|
 |
 |
|
For comparison I’m showing two filters for 5760Mhz, a 3 section post type in WR137 (the larger of the two) and an evanescent mode design in WR62. The post type has very narrow bandwidth and was tricky to adjust, the performance of both filters is more than adequate in a 144Mhz IF transverter.
The 3 section post type filter would be more than a handful to adjust without a sweeper and analyser. Depending on the application, if this was intended for a transverter then I’d suggest the evanescent mode filter because of its simplicity while offering adequate performance.
The WR137 filter is a fairly hefty beast and it’s size and weight would be quite noticeable in portable equipment.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
24Ghz Waveguide Filter |
|
|
 |
 |
|
This is a 3 section post type filter in WR42 waveguide, again using the WGFIL program from WA4LPR to determine the dimensions for a centre frequency fo 24,048Mhz. This filter uses 1/16” and 1/8” hobby brass tube for the posts and with waveguide flanges, it’s quick and easy to fabricate.
I’ve used 2-56 silver plated screws (salvaged from other K band filters) as tuning elements although I suspect not much would be lost in using brass screws.
|
|
 |
 |
|
The response of this filter isn’t as good as I’d expect from a 3 section type in waveguide. However it indicates the filter is usable with a 432Mhz IF, in this case using low side injection we can expect around 30dB or better rejection of the LO and image frequencies. Horizontal divisions are 200Mhz and vertical divisions 10dB. The centre marker is 24.048Ghz.
I’m unable to measure the return loss of this filter, I’d appreciate hearing from anyone with a spare HP85027E bridge kicking around they don’t want... ;O)
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
OE9PMJ 24Ghz Filter |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
This is a cavity style filter that exhibits a very sharp response, less than 100Mhz at 24Ghz... as I said very sharp!
Dimensional tolerance is fairly important with this filter, a mill-drill is a handy tool although Neil VK2EI did tell me about his attempts to make this filter using copper pipes and soldering the whole thing together. I’m not sure that’s the approach I’d want to take given I have a mill to make the component parts out of aluminium, as shown. Neil got his pipe model to work, I didn’t, so perhaps simple is best?
My first attempt yeilded a filter resonant on 25.058Ghz, close but not close enough. The tuning screws weren’t able to pull the filter anywhwere near 24.048Ghz, so I went back to the mill to widen the cavity dimensions.
I used an idea from Andy VK2AES that replicates the cavities using a square configuration. The original OE9PMJ design describes 18mm circular cavities, however because I can’t drive an 18mm end-mill I decided to try an alternative method. Using a 10mm end mill and moving it 6.5mm in the X and Y planes yields a cavity of the same overall area as an 18mm circular cavity. Andy VK2AES had modelled this idea using CST Studio and with mill radii of various sizes.
Anyway, the first attempt was interesting. I will now go back and re-fabricate the bottom housing with cavities and try again... I think tolerances are important in filters of this type at the frequencies we’re talking about.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Notice in the right hand photo the ‘square circular’ cavities? The input and output takes WR42 waveguide but notice that the input and output apertures are circular, also the coupling between the cavities is a circular aperture. I was unable to measure the RL of this filter but I suspect it’s reasonable given the insertion loss is around 2dB.
These filters are very interesting for higher microwave frequencies, they certainly exhibit a very narrow response which makes them useful for single conversion down to a 144Mhz IF.
I really enjoyed making this filter, even though it didn’t work first go. It certainly helped me improve my skills with the mill and made me very aware of tolerances and measurement. It shows great potential at frequencies above 24Ghz as a simple and effective filter structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|